Our Grouse Against Jonathan, By Tambuwal, House Members
 House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal
 
 
Chuks Okocha
Chuks Okocha
 The Peoples Democratic Party’s intervention in the seeming cold 
relationship between the House of Representatives and President Goodluck
 Jonathan seems to be helping to unravel the annoyance of the lawmakers.
 But the reasons alleged to be behind the intermittent faceoff between 
the president and the House, dominated by his party, may be creating 
other pressures for the president.   
PDP National Chairman Alhaji Bamanga Tukur and members of the party’s National Working Committee met behind closed doors on Wednesday in Abuja with principal officers of the House for more than four hours to try to know why the House and the Presidency are always at loggerheads.
 House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal led his deputy, Emeka Ihedioha, House 
Leader Mulikat Akande, Deputy House Leader Leo Ogor, and House Chief 
Whip Isiaka Bawa to the meeting that had all members of the NWC in 
attendance.
 Though in his opening comments before they went into the closed-door 
session, the speaker said the relationship between the lower chamber and
 the Executive was cordial.
 But Tamuwal doubted Jonathan’s commitment to the professed roadmap of the party.
“Members of the National Assembly, particularly, members of the PDP are very much committed to the manifesto of our party and we are aware of what the manifesto of our party is all about. It was the manifesto of our party that we marketed and won elections with.
“Members of the National Assembly, particularly, members of the PDP are very much committed to the manifesto of our party and we are aware of what the manifesto of our party is all about. It was the manifesto of our party that we marketed and won elections with.
 “Mr. Chairman, we are very much abreast of the programmes of our party,
 we are keeping in line with those programmes, we are doing our best to 
ensure that our country and the people that elected us get the best out 
of all of us,” the speaker stated.
 But THISDAY learnt it was during the private session with the NWC that 
Tambuwal and other members of the House delegation opened up on why the 
PDP-dominated legislature had often opposed the president.
 According to a member of the NWC who attended the closed-door session, 
the lawmakers “accused the President of constituting members of his team
 from non- members of the party, who do not understand the PDP manifesto
 and, therefore, do not understand the programmes of PDP.”
 The source said that the Tambuwal delegation wanted the party to ask Jonathan which party’s manifesto he was implementing.
 “They asked us to inquire from the President whether members of the 
party are actually involved in the implementation of the programmes of 
his administration and also whether those running the affairs of the 
administration are PDP members who understand the manifesto of PDP as a 
political party," the source said.
 The delegation faulted the insistence of the Presidency on $75 crude 
oil benchmark for the 2013 budget, blaming this on the inclusion in the 
cabinet of non PDP members who do not understand the manifesto of the 
party and its implementation for the delivery of the dividends of 
democracy to the country.
 Besides, the source said PDP members of the House were also not happy 
that members of President Jonathan’s Economic Management Team are not 
members of PDP that understand the economic philosophy of the party’s 
manifesto.
 On their relationship with the party, the Tambuwal-led delegation was 
said to have told the NWC that the party had not helped its members in 
the House, especially during elections, since the inception of the 
Fourth Republic.
They said the party’s indifferent disposition was responsible for the high turnover of members of the House and indeed the National Assembly.
They said the party’s indifferent disposition was responsible for the high turnover of members of the House and indeed the National Assembly.
 According to the source, “The delegation complained that PDP as a 
political party is not helping committed party members in their 
re-election, especially during the primary elections.
 “They complained that members have nothing to show to the electorate in
 their constituencies regarding what the party has done to ensure their 
re-election. They further said the Executive arm was not helping the 
members to ensure the implementation of the constituency projects, which
 is the only way they can impart the dividends of democracy to the 
electorate.”
 According to the delegation, these made it difficult for PDP members 
seeking re-election to lay their hands on tangible deliverables to 
convince the electorate on why they should be re-elected, hence making 
them vulnerable during the primary elections and the election proper.
 At the meeting, the PDP national chairman was said to have promised 
that the party would try and ensure that performing legislators got 
re-election tickets.
 The House in recent times has had a rather confrontational relationship with the president.
In July, lawmakers in the lower chamber sternly berated the president for allegedly implementing only about 35 per cent of last year’s budget of N4.7 trillion.
In July, lawmakers in the lower chamber sternly berated the president for allegedly implementing only about 35 per cent of last year’s budget of N4.7 trillion.
 They adopted a motion by the Minority Leader Femi Gbajabiamila, which 
gave Jonathan till September to achieve full implementation of the 
budget or risk impeachment.
 That face-off came shortly after a similar row over the lower chamber’s
 invitation of the president to come and brief members in an executive 
session on his administration’s efforts at tackling the growing 
insecurity in the country.
The latest standoff involves the crude oil price benchmark for the 2013 budget. While the president based the budget on a benchmark of $75 per barrel, the House has insisted on $80 per barrel, with the Senate proposing $78 per barrel.
The latest standoff involves the crude oil price benchmark for the 2013 budget. While the president based the budget on a benchmark of $75 per barrel, the House has insisted on $80 per barrel, with the Senate proposing $78 per barrel.
No comments:
Post a Comment