Our Grouse Against Jonathan, By Tambuwal, House Members
House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal
Chuks Okocha
Chuks Okocha
The Peoples Democratic Party’s intervention in the seeming cold
relationship between the House of Representatives and President Goodluck
Jonathan seems to be helping to unravel the annoyance of the lawmakers.
But the reasons alleged to be behind the intermittent faceoff between
the president and the House, dominated by his party, may be creating
other pressures for the president.
PDP National Chairman Alhaji Bamanga Tukur and members of the party’s National Working Committee met behind closed doors on Wednesday in Abuja with principal officers of the House for more than four hours to try to know why the House and the Presidency are always at loggerheads.
House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal led his deputy, Emeka Ihedioha, House
Leader Mulikat Akande, Deputy House Leader Leo Ogor, and House Chief
Whip Isiaka Bawa to the meeting that had all members of the NWC in
attendance.
Though in his opening comments before they went into the closed-door
session, the speaker said the relationship between the lower chamber and
the Executive was cordial.
But Tamuwal doubted Jonathan’s commitment to the professed roadmap of the party.
“Members of the National Assembly, particularly, members of the PDP are very much committed to the manifesto of our party and we are aware of what the manifesto of our party is all about. It was the manifesto of our party that we marketed and won elections with.
“Members of the National Assembly, particularly, members of the PDP are very much committed to the manifesto of our party and we are aware of what the manifesto of our party is all about. It was the manifesto of our party that we marketed and won elections with.
“Mr. Chairman, we are very much abreast of the programmes of our party,
we are keeping in line with those programmes, we are doing our best to
ensure that our country and the people that elected us get the best out
of all of us,” the speaker stated.
But THISDAY learnt it was during the private session with the NWC that
Tambuwal and other members of the House delegation opened up on why the
PDP-dominated legislature had often opposed the president.
According to a member of the NWC who attended the closed-door session,
the lawmakers “accused the President of constituting members of his team
from non- members of the party, who do not understand the PDP manifesto
and, therefore, do not understand the programmes of PDP.”
The source said that the Tambuwal delegation wanted the party to ask Jonathan which party’s manifesto he was implementing.
“They asked us to inquire from the President whether members of the
party are actually involved in the implementation of the programmes of
his administration and also whether those running the affairs of the
administration are PDP members who understand the manifesto of PDP as a
political party," the source said.
The delegation faulted the insistence of the Presidency on $75 crude
oil benchmark for the 2013 budget, blaming this on the inclusion in the
cabinet of non PDP members who do not understand the manifesto of the
party and its implementation for the delivery of the dividends of
democracy to the country.
Besides, the source said PDP members of the House were also not happy
that members of President Jonathan’s Economic Management Team are not
members of PDP that understand the economic philosophy of the party’s
manifesto.
On their relationship with the party, the Tambuwal-led delegation was
said to have told the NWC that the party had not helped its members in
the House, especially during elections, since the inception of the
Fourth Republic.
They said the party’s indifferent disposition was responsible for the high turnover of members of the House and indeed the National Assembly.
They said the party’s indifferent disposition was responsible for the high turnover of members of the House and indeed the National Assembly.
According to the source, “The delegation complained that PDP as a
political party is not helping committed party members in their
re-election, especially during the primary elections.
“They complained that members have nothing to show to the electorate in
their constituencies regarding what the party has done to ensure their
re-election. They further said the Executive arm was not helping the
members to ensure the implementation of the constituency projects, which
is the only way they can impart the dividends of democracy to the
electorate.”
According to the delegation, these made it difficult for PDP members
seeking re-election to lay their hands on tangible deliverables to
convince the electorate on why they should be re-elected, hence making
them vulnerable during the primary elections and the election proper.
At the meeting, the PDP national chairman was said to have promised
that the party would try and ensure that performing legislators got
re-election tickets.
The House in recent times has had a rather confrontational relationship with the president.
In July, lawmakers in the lower chamber sternly berated the president for allegedly implementing only about 35 per cent of last year’s budget of N4.7 trillion.
In July, lawmakers in the lower chamber sternly berated the president for allegedly implementing only about 35 per cent of last year’s budget of N4.7 trillion.
They adopted a motion by the Minority Leader Femi Gbajabiamila, which
gave Jonathan till September to achieve full implementation of the
budget or risk impeachment.
That face-off came shortly after a similar row over the lower chamber’s
invitation of the president to come and brief members in an executive
session on his administration’s efforts at tackling the growing
insecurity in the country.
The latest standoff involves the crude oil price benchmark for the 2013 budget. While the president based the budget on a benchmark of $75 per barrel, the House has insisted on $80 per barrel, with the Senate proposing $78 per barrel.
The latest standoff involves the crude oil price benchmark for the 2013 budget. While the president based the budget on a benchmark of $75 per barrel, the House has insisted on $80 per barrel, with the Senate proposing $78 per barrel.
No comments:
Post a Comment